In a statement to CNN, the NRA said it will still “pursue establishing business operations in Texas, and the organization will continue to explore moving its headquarters there from Virginia.”
The decision from Judge Harlin Hale, of the Northern District of Texas, came after a monthlong trial in which NRA attorneys and officials argued that their bankruptcy case should move forward in Texas. James’ office intervened in the case and asked to dismiss the petition, saying the NRA’s decision to file for bankruptcy in Texas and ask to be reincorporated there was a way to “remove the NRA from regulatory oversight.”
Hale agreed with James’ office’s argument in his ruling issued Tuesday.
“The Court finds there is cause to dismiss this bankruptcy case as not having been filed in good faith both because it was filed to gain an unfair litigation advantage and because it was filed to avoid a state regulatory scheme,” Hale wrote in his decision.
Hale also declined to appoint a trustee or examiner to oversee the NRA’s finances.
“Today’s order reaffirms that the NRA does not get to dictate if and where it will answer for its actions,” James said in a statement. “The rot runs deep, which is why we will now refocus on and continue our case in New York court. No one is above the law, not even one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the country.”
Hale declined to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning the NRA could still decide to file a bankruptcy petition in another venue, but Hale warned that if the NRA chooses to file a new bankruptcy case, his court would immediately take up some of its concerns about “disclosure, transparency, secrecy, conflicts of interest of litigation counsel,” among others, which could lead to the appointment of a trustee to oversee the organization’s affairs. A spokesman for the NRA had no comment when asked by CNN if it plans to file for bankruptcy elsewhere.
“The NRA will continue to defend the interests of the Association in New York,” William A. Brewer III, an attorney for the NRA, said in a statement to CNN. “Our client has faith in its leadership, and its demonstrated commitment to good governance.”
Brian Mittendorf, a professor of accounting at Ohio State University who has followed the NRA’s finances for several years, said the ruling has implications for the various lawsuits the NRA is facing, as well as its financial future.
“In many ways it was a high-risk gambit to think that a bankruptcy court would allow them to bypass some of that litigation,” Mittendorf told CNN. “The ruling just clears up that fact that that litigation is going to continue and that there isn’t this remedy that entailed a third-party effectively running the organization in the meantime.”
After the decision was issued Tuesday, James said that her office’s case against the NRA was never delayed by the bankruptcy filing and that a trial could happen in 2022.
“We are in the midst of discovery and discovery will continue at this time,” James said.
Allegations of financial misconduct
The virtual trial in a North Texas bankruptcy court included testimony from top current and former NRA officials, including Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre, who testified on April 7 that he had kept news of the impending bankruptcy filing from the NRA’s own general counsel, chief financial officer and other salaried NRA officials.
Hale called LaPierre’s decision to file for bankruptcy without notifying the NRA’s board and others “troubling” in his decision.
“The Court agrees with the NYAG that the NRA is using this bankruptcy case to address a regulatory enforcement problem, not a financial one,” Hale wrote.
Texas attorney Gerrit Pronske, who is representing James’ office in court, argued during closing arguments on May 3 that the bankruptcy filing should be dismissed for being filed in “bad faith,” pointing to a public letter to NRA members on the day the organization filed for bankruptcy in which LaPierre wrote: “The NRA is not ‘bankrupt’ or ‘going out of business.’ “
“We are as financially strong as we have been in years,” the letter signed by LaPierre read.
Gregory Garman, an attorney for the NRA, argued last week that the organization has $40 million in “unfunded future litigation.” But Pronske countered that financial statements showed the NRA has “plenty of cash on hand.”
“I would submit, as a part of a good faith filing, you have to have some problems with your financial condition and you have to have debt issues either now or in the foreseeable future,” Pronske said. “The NRA does not have a debt problem … it has a regulatory problem.”
Although the NRA’s headquarters is in Fairfax, Virginia, it’s been incorporated in the state of New York since shortly after the Civil War.
The suit alleges NRA leadership used millions from the group’s reserves to fund lavish trips on private jets, meals and other personal expenses and that money was diverted to benefit NRA insiders and favored vendors, that LaPierre handpicked associates to “facilitate his misuse of charitable assets” and that the NRA board did not follow an appropriate process to determine “reasonable” compensation for NRA executives, including LaPierre.
LaPierre testified during the 12-day bankruptcy trial that he currently makes $1.3 million after taking a 20% pay reduction “voluntarily” when the organization had to make cuts to other employees’ salaries last year.
“I think my compensation has always been reasonable,” LaPierre testified last month.
He also testified that he believes the NRA “is in a much better place today.”
“I think it’s stronger. I think the controls are stronger,” LaPierre testified. “I think the possibility of any overrides of controls are not going to happen. The protections are in place. I feel very good about where we are.”
This story has been updated with additional details and background.