Epic Games’ lawsuit against Apple for anti-competitive practices on the App Store began on Monday, May 3rd. At the first hearing, attorneys from both sides presented their opening speeches in federal court in Oakland, California. The first witness, Epic Games founder and CEO Tim Sweeney, was heard.
Freedom for epic games, security for Apple
On that first day, the positions of the two camps came as no surprise. At Epic Games, Apple uses anti-competitive practices in the App Store by preventing developers from having their own in-app payment system. For Apple, the goal of the process is to authorize third-party application stores such as the Epic Games Store on the iPhone.
The rating of the Ant Group was halved
In short, Epic wants to be free to sell digital goods and services through its application without paying any commission. Apple wants to demonstrate that Epic is aiming to destabilize iOS, which can lead to security issues. For journalist Adi Robertson following the process for the media The edgeThe two parties are trying to embody great ideals, freedom for Epic, security for Apple. The journalist is ironic about the fact that everyone has ” seemed shocked – shocked – (sic) that her opponent is trying to make money “.
Epic against the “walled garden” of the App Store
Video game maker lawyers denounce a situation in which “” Developers were trapped “By exhuming internal documents from the sometimes ten-year-old apple brand, they wanted to show that” Apple’s plan was to ban users and prevent them from leaving the ecosystem “.
On the contrary, Cupertino’s lawyers claimed that the company had ” invited developers without compromising the privacy and accountability, safety and quality that consumers wanted “.
Consoles, App Store Competitors or Not?
They rejected Epic’s narrow view of a competitive market that would rule out platforms other than the iPhone such as PCs or game consoles. They found that Sony charged the publisher a commission for internal Fortnite purchases made through PC if the affected consumer enjoyed the game on the PlayStation without getting in Epic’s way.
For Tim Sweeney, the comparison is irrelevant because the two ecosystems are different. The consoles are sold at a loss by the companies that develop them, which would encourage them to treat developers more fairly. An argument that Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers made doubtful and intervened to ask: ” How does this differ from consoles – not so much on the payment side, but in developing the technology that will allow your product to be played with? “.
Tim Sweeney under fire for questions
Following the presentation of the game, the Fortnite experience, its engine, how it worked, the console and app store discussion, Tim Sweeney was interrogated by Apple’s lawyers. The latter attempted to destabilize him by questioning him for a decade about the existence of the epic game on the App Store. The founder of Epic replied in a calm tone that the situation had worsened from year to year.
The Apple Case: A Screen In The Face Of Epic’s Revenue Cuts?
Apple lawyers have accused Tim Sweeney of setting up Project Liberty, the legal and communications plan against Apple, for profit reasons. They believe the procedure is related to Fortnite’s declining popularity.
A Document submitted to the court Details of Epic Games’ revenue from Fortnite success: $ 9 billion generated between 2018 and 2019 for “only” $ 3.6 billion in 2020. Tim Sweeney denied, instead increasing the number from $ 5.1 billion in 2020.
The cross-examination of Tim Sweeney by Apple lawyers is ongoing and is set to continue on Tuesday, May 4th. Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, and executives and former executives from Apple and other technology companies are due to testify in the coming weeks.